First and foremost, the impact of the planes on 9-11 would not have been enough to bring the towers down. Also, what was not touched on was how the steel that was holding the building in place melted. Now how could the steel on the twin towers melt if the melting point of steel is 2,800*F? and the amount of heat generated by jet-fuel-based-fires does not exceed 1800*F. This Doesn't make any logical sense. In addition, Demolitions experts state that only explosives could have brought the towers down, the way they came down. The buildings came down in a free fall manner; straight down. If the fires were to have burned longer than they did, after about six hours the buildings might have fallen apart bit by bit. However, the World Trade Center Twin Towers came down like a scheduled demolition. So if no terrorist group had access to place explosives throughout both structures who did?
Monday, November 14, 2011
9-11 What "They" Don't Want You to Know
First and foremost, the impact of the planes on 9-11 would not have been enough to bring the towers down. Also, what was not touched on was how the steel that was holding the building in place melted. Now how could the steel on the twin towers melt if the melting point of steel is 2,800*F? and the amount of heat generated by jet-fuel-based-fires does not exceed 1800*F. This Doesn't make any logical sense. In addition, Demolitions experts state that only explosives could have brought the towers down, the way they came down. The buildings came down in a free fall manner; straight down. If the fires were to have burned longer than they did, after about six hours the buildings might have fallen apart bit by bit. However, the World Trade Center Twin Towers came down like a scheduled demolition. So if no terrorist group had access to place explosives throughout both structures who did?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Interesting conspiracy theory
ReplyDelete